Practice Update December 2025

3 December 2025

Rental deductions maximisation strategies


The golden rule for maximising rental deductions is simple. If an expense directly relates to earning rental income, you can probably claim it. Things like:

  • Loan interest
  • Property management fees
  • Repairs that fix things (not improve them)
  • Insurance
  • Rates

Travel to inspect your property is off-limits for residential properties, and anything that improves your property counts as a capital improvement, not a repair.

Here’s your quick mental test: Does this expense help me earn rental income right now? If yes, it’s likely deductible. Does it make my property worth more or better than before? That’s probably a capital improvement you’ll need to depreciate over time.

Bottom line: Focus on ongoing expenses, keep every receipt, and learn the difference between fixing and improving. Your future self (and bank account) will thank you.


The good news: What you can claim on your tax return

Let’s start with the exciting stuff — the expenses that can legitimately reduce your tax bill. The ATO’s rental property expense guidelines are actually quite generous when you understand what qualifies.


Loan interest: Your strongest friend

For most investors, this is the heavyweight champion of deductions. Every dollar of interest you pay on loans used to buy, build, or improve your rental property is fully deductible. Whether your property is making money or bleeding cash doesn’t matter. If the loan was for investment purposes, the interest is claimable.


Property management and letting fees

Using a property manager? Every fee they charge (from tenant finding to rent collection to maintenance) is fully deductible. Even if you manage the property yourself, you can claim advertising costs for finding tenants and other direct letting expenses.


Repairs and maintenance

This is where it gets interesting. You can claim repairs that restore your property to its previous condition, but not improvements that make it better than before fixing a broken tap. Deductible. Upgrading to a fancy new mixer? That’s a capital improvement.

If replacing like with like, old carpet with a similar carpet, broken fence palings with new palings, that’s usually a repair. But if you’re upgrading from basic to premium, or adding something that wasn’t there before, that’s typically an improvement.


Insurance and ongoing Costs

All your property insurance premiums are deductible. Building insurance, contents insurance if you provide furnishings, and landlord insurance. Council rates, water rates, strata fees, and land tax are all claimable too, as long as you’re the one actually paying them.


Professional services

An accountant’s fee for preparing your rental property tax return is deductible. Legal fees for lease agreements or tenant disputes? Yes. Even the cost of getting a depreciation schedule prepared is claimable (and usually pays for itself many times over).


The reality check: What you can’t claim

Now for the part that often catches investors off guard. Some expenses that seem obviously related to your rental property are specifically excluded, and claiming them incorrectly can result in penalties that make a bad tenant look like a minor inconvenience.


Travel expenses: The big no

Since 1 July 2017, you can’t claim any deductions for the cost of travel you incur relating to your residential rental property unless you are either in the business of letting rental properties or an excluded entity (like a company). Period. Doesn’t matter if you drive across town or fly interstate, whether the inspection was urgent, or if you combined it with other business. The ATO’s travel restrictions for residential properties are crystal clear and non-negotiable.


Pre-rental repairs: Timing is everything

Did you do some work before first renting out your property? Those costs are generally considered capital improvements, not deductible repairs. The property needs to be earning income (or genuinely available for rent) for repair costs to be deductible.


Capital improvements: The long game

Added air conditioning where there was none? Built a deck? Renovated the kitchen? These improvements make your property more valuable, which means they can’t be claimed immediately. Instead, they might be eligible for depreciation over many years or added to your property’s cost base for capital gains tax purposes.


Personal Use: The honesty test

If you or your family use the property for holidays or personal purposes, you need to reduce your deductions proportionally. Did you use your beach house rental for a two-week family holiday? You can’t claim expenses for those two weeks, and you need to apportion the other annual expenses fairly.


Depreciation: The deduction that keeps on giving

Here’s where many investors miss out on serious money. Depreciation allows you to claim deductions for the decline in value of your property and its contents over time, even when you’re not spending any money out of pocket.


Two types of depreciation

Building depreciation (capital works) applies to the structure itself for properties built or renovated after specific dates. You can claim 2.5% of the construction cost each year for 40 years for most residential properties. For a building that cost $400,000 to construct, that’s $10,000 per year in deductions.

Plant and equipment depreciation covers removable items like appliances, carpets, blinds, and air conditioning. Each item has an “effective life” over which it can be depreciated.


The catch for established properties

For properties purchased after 9 May 2017, you generally can’t claim plant and equipment depreciation on second-hand items that came with the property. But here’s the opportunity: any new items you add can still be depreciated from day one.

Strategies for 2025-26 and beyond

Successful rental property tax management isn’t just about claiming deductions after you’ve spent the money. Strategic thinking about timing, record-keeping, and planning can significantly boost your investment returns.


Timing your expenses

Consider bunching deductible expenses into years when you need them most. Expecting a higher income this year? Bringing forward some maintenance work can provide valuable tax relief. Planning to be in a higher tax bracket next year? Maybe defer some discretionary repairs.


The prepayment opportunity

You can often prepay certain expenses, such as insurance premiums and property management fees, to accelerate deductions into the current year. If you prepaid a rental property expense, such as insurance or interest on borrowed money, that covers a period of 12 months or less and ends on or before 30 June 2025, you can claim an immediate deduction.


Record-keeping that actually works

Forget the shoebox approach. Modern property management apps can automatically categorise expenses, store receipts digitally, and generate reports that make tax time a breeze. Some even integrate with accounting software to streamline the whole process.


Annual strategy reviews

Your property’s tax position should be reviewed annually, not just at tax time. New purchases, renovations, and changes in tax law can create opportunities you might miss if you’re only thinking about tax once a year.


The costly mistakes we see every year

After decades of helping property investors, we’ve noticed the same expensive mistakes keep cropping up. Learning from others’ errors can save you significant money and stress.


The missing depreciation schedule

This is probably the biggest money-loser we see. Investors assume depreciation isn’t worth bothering with, or they don’t realise it exists. A professional depreciation schedule typically costs $600-800 but often identifies thousands in annual deductions.


Repair vs improvement confusion

The classic mistake: claiming a kitchen renovation as a repair when it’s clearly an improvement. The ATO has seen this before, and getting it wrong can result in penalties plus interest on the tax you should have paid.


Inadequate record-keeping

“I know I had that receipt somewhere” isn’t a defence that works well with the ATO. Poor record-keeping not only means you might miss legitimate deductions, but it also puts you at risk if your return is reviewed.


Personal use miscalculations

Some investors conveniently forget about the week they spent at their holiday rental, or they allow family to stay without charging market rent. The ATO expects honesty in apportioning expenses, and getting this wrong can be costly.


Travel expense claims

Despite clear guidance, some investors still try to claim travel costs for property inspections. This is a red flag for ATO reviews and can lead to deeper scrutiny of your entire return.


Staying compliant: Your safety net

The ATO takes rental property deductions seriously, and having proper documentation isn’t just good practice — it’s your insurance policy against penalties and stress.


The five-year rule

Keep all records related to your rental property for five years after lodging your tax return. This includes receipts, bank statements, loan documents, insurance policies, photos of repairs, and any professional reports.


What good records look like

For each expense, you should be able to show what was purchased, when, how much it cost, and how it relates to earning rental income. Photos of damage before and after repairs can be invaluable for substantiating claims.


Professional documentation

Keep detailed records of any professional advice or services. Property management agreements, legal correspondence, and tax preparation fees all need proper documentation showing the specific services provided.



Regular reviews and updates

Don’t wait until tax time to organise your records. Set up systems to capture expenses throughout the year, and review your deductions quarterly to ensure you’re not missing anything or claiming something incorrectly.


28 October 2025
A Practical Guide to Running Your Family Business in Australia
27 October 2025
TI scams in Australia: how to spot them and stay safe
2 September 2025
Land tax in Australia: exemptions, tips and lessons Land tax is one of those quiet state-based taxes that does not grab headlines like income tax or GST, but impacts property owners once thresholds are crossed. It applies when the unimproved value of land exceeds a certain amount, which differs from state to state. Principal places of residence are usually exempt, but investment properties, commercial holdings, and certain rural blocks may be subject to taxation. For individuals and small businesses, land tax is worth paying attention to because exemptions can make the difference between a manageable annual bill and a nasty surprise. A recent case in New South Wales (Zonadi case ) has sharpened the focus on when land used for cultivation qualifies for the primary production exemption. The lessons are timely for farmers, winegrowers and anyone with mixed-use rural land. The basics of land tax Each state and territory (except the Northern Territory) imposes land tax. Key features include: Assessment date : Usually determined at midnight on 31 December of the preceding year (for example, the 2026 assessment is based on ownership and use as at 31 December 2025). Thresholds : Vary across jurisdictions. For example, in 2025, the NSW threshold is $1,075,000, while in Victoria it is $300,000. Exemptions : Principal place of residence, primary production land, land owned by charities and specific concessional categories. Rates : Progressive, with higher landholdings paying higher rates. Unlike council rates, which fund local services, land tax is a revenue measure for states. It is payable annually and calculated on the total taxable value of landholdings. Primary production exemption Most states exempt land used for primary production from land tax. The policy aim is precise: farmers should not be burdened with land tax when using their land to produce food, fibre or similar goods. However, the details of what constitutes primary production vary. Qualifying uses generally include: cultivation (growing crops or horticulture) maintaining animals (grazing, dairying, poultry, etc.) commercial fishing and aquaculture beekeeping Sounds straightforward, but the catch is in how the land is used and for what purpose. Lessons from the Zonadi case The Zonadi case involved an 11-hectare vineyard in the Hunter Valley. The land was used for: 4.2ha of vines producing wine grapes a cellar door and wine storage area a residence and tourist accommodation some trees, paddocks and access ways During five land tax years in dispute, the taxpayer sold some grapes directly but used most of the crop to make wine off-site, which was then sold through the cellar door. Income was derived from grape sales, wine sales and tourist accommodation. The NSW Tribunal had to decide whether the land’s dominant use was cultivation for the purpose of selling the produce of that cultivation (a requirement under section 10AA of the NSW Land Tax Management Act). The outcome was a blow for the taxpayer. The Tribunal said: Growing grapes was indeed a form of cultivation and amounted to primary production. But cultivation for the purpose of making wine did not qualify, because the exemption only applies where the produce is sold in its natural state. Wine is a converted product, not the product of cultivation. Although some grapes were sold directly, the bulk of the financial gain came from wine sales. Therefore, the dominant use of the land was cultivation to make and sell wine, which is not exempt. The exemption was denied, and the taxpayer was left with a land tax bill. Why this matters For small businesses, especially those that combine farming with value-adding activities such as processing or tourism, the case serves as a warning. The line between primary production and secondary production can determine whether a land tax exemption applies. If most income comes from a cellar door, farmstay, or product manufacturing, the exemption may be at risk, even though cultivation is occurring on the land. Different rules in Victoria Victoria takes a broader view. It defines primary production to include cultivation for the purpose of selling the produce in a natural, processed or converted state. In other words, grapes sold for wine production would still be considered primary production. The only further hurdle is the “use test”, which depends on location: outside Greater Melbourne: land must be used primarily for primary production within urban zones: land must be used solely or mainly for the business of primary production Had Zonadi been in Victoria, the outcome could have been very different. The vineyard would likely have been exempt from this requirement. State-based comparisons Here’s a snapshot of how land tax treatment differs across states when it comes to cultivation and primary production: