Practice Update June 2024

Ian Campbell • 1 June 2024

Practice Update - June 2024

ATO's three focus areas this tax time

The ATO will be taking a close look this 'tax time' at the following common errors made by taxpayers:


Work related expenses: Taxpayers using the 'revised fixed rate method' of calculating a working from home deduction must have comprehensive records to substantiate their claims, including records that show the actual number of hours they worked from home, and the additional running costs they incurred to claim a deduction.


Rental properties: Performing general repairs and maintenance on a rental property can be claimed as an immediate deduction. However, expenses which are capital in nature (such as initial repairs on a newly purchased property) are not deductible as repairs or maintenance.


Failing to include all income in tax return: The ATO warns taxpayers against rushing to lodge their tax return on 1 July. If they have received income from multiple sources, they need to wait until this is pre-filled in their tax return before lodging.

 

End of financial year obligations for employers

The ATO reminds employers they need to keep on top of their payroll governance. This includes:


  • using their tax and super software to record the amounts they pay;
  • withholding the right amount of tax; and
  • calculating superannuation guarantee ('SG') correctly.


As 30 June gets closer, employers should check their reporting obligations, along with any upcoming key dates, including for:


  • PAYG withholding — From 1 July, the individual income tax rate thresholds and tax tables will change, which will impact their PAYG withholding for the 2025 tax year;
  • SG rate change — From 1 July, the SG rate will increase to 11.5%. Employers must pay their SG contributions by 28 July in full, on time and to the right fund; and
  • Single touch payroll ('STP') reporting — Employers should remember to make STP finalisation declarations by 14 July for all employees the employer has paid during the financial year, and also check their employees' year-to-date amounts are correct.


Getting trust distributions right

As trustees prepare for year-end distributions, they should do the following:


  • review the relevant trust deed to ensure they are making decisions consistent with the terms of the deed;
  • consider who the intended beneficiaries are and their entitlement to income and capital under the trust deed;
  • notify beneficiaries of their entitlements, so that the beneficiaries can correctly report distributions in their tax returns;
  • consider whether the trust has any capital gains or franked distributions they would like to stream to beneficiaries; and
  • check any requirements under the trust deed governing the making of trustee resolutions (e.g., that the resolution must be in


writing). In any case, resolutions regarding distributions need to be made by the end of the income year.

Editor: If you need any assistance in relation to your trusts, please contact our office.

 

Support available for businesses experiencing difficulties

By paying their tax bill in full and on time, taxpayers can avoid paying the general interest charge ('GIC'), which is currently 11.34%, and which accrues daily for any overdue debts.


The ATO advises taxpayers that, if their business is dealing with financial difficulties, there are some options to help make their tax bill "less taxing".


Taxpayers who are struggling to pay in full or on time may be eligible to set up a payment plan. If they owe $200,000 or less, they may be able to do this themselves using online services. If they cannot do so, or they owe more than $200,000, they can contact the ATO to discuss their options.


Taxpayers can ask the ATO to remit their GIC. The ATO will then consider whether the tax bill was paid late because of circumstances that were:


  • beyond the taxpayer's control, and what steps the taxpayer took to relieve the effects of those circumstances; or
  • within the taxpayer's control, but led to results that the taxpayer could not foresee.

Editor: If you need assistance in relation to paying your tax bill, please contact our office.

 

Minimum yearly repayments on Division 7A loans

To avoid an unfranked dividend under the Division 7A rules, loans from a private company to its shareholders or their associates must be either repaid in full or be covered by a 'Division 7A complying loan agreement' before the company's lodgment day.


Complying loan agreements require minimum yearly repayments ('MYRs') comprising of interest and principal to be made each year, starting from the income year after the loan is made.

Taxpayers must ensure they can meet the required MYRs on complying loans. 

If they miss the MYR or do not pay enough in an income year, the shortfall may be treated as an unfranked dividend.


Note also that borrowing additional amounts from the same company, directly or indirectly, to make repayments on complying loans may result in the repayment not being taken into account in working out if the MYR has been made.


 

When making MYRs, borrowers need to:


  • start repayments in the income year after the complying loan was made;
  • use the correct benchmark interest rate (8.27% for the 2024 income year) to calculate the MYR for the current year; and
  • make the required payments on the loan by the due date — the end of the income year (i.e., usually by 30 June).

 

ATO issues notice of crypto assets data-matching program

The ATO has advised that it will acquire account identification and transaction data from crypto designated service providers for the 2024 to 2026 income years.


This data will include the following:


  • client identification details (names, addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers, social media accounts and email addresses); and
  • transaction details (bank account details, wallet addresses, transaction dates, transaction times, transaction types, deposits, withdrawals, transaction quantities and coin types).


The ATO estimates that records relating to approximately 700,000 to 1,200,000 individuals and entities will be obtained each financial year.



The data will be acquired and matched to ATO systems to identify and treat clients who failed to report a disposal of crypto assets in their income tax return.

Practice Update January 2026

20 January 2026
A real-world case study on trust distributions Mark and Lisa had what most people would describe as a “pretty standard” setup. They ran a successful family business through a discretionary trust. The trust had been in place for years, established when the business was small and cash was tight. Over time, the business grew, profits improved, and the trust started distributing decent amounts of income each year. The tax returns were lodged. Nobody had ever had a problem with the ATO. So naturally, they assumed everything was fine. This is where the story starts to get interesting. Year one: the harmless decision In a good year, the business made about $280,000. It was suggested that some income be distributed to Mark and Lisa’s two adult children, Josh and Emily. Both were over 18, both were studying, and neither earned much income. On paper, it made sense. Josh received $40,000. Emily received $40,000. The rest was split between Mark, Lisa, and a company beneficiary. The tax bill went down. Everyone was happy. But here’s the first quiet detail that mattered later. Josh and Emily never actually received the money. No bank transfer. No separate accounts. No conversations about what they wanted to do with it. The trust kept the funds in its main business account and used them to pay suppliers and reduce debt. At the time, nobody thought twice. “It’s still family money.” “They can access it if they need it.” “We’ll square it up later.” These are very common thoughts. And this is exactly where risk quietly begins. Year two: things get a little more complicated The next year was even better. They used a bucket company to cap tax at the company rate. Again, a common and legitimate strategy when used properly. So the trust distributed $200,000 to the company. No cash moved. It was recorded as an unpaid present entitlement. The idea was that the company would get paid later, when cash flow allowed. Meanwhile, the trust needed funds to buy new equipment and cover a short-term cash squeeze. The trust borrowed money from the company. There was a loan agreement. Interest was charged. Everything looked tidy on paper. From the outside, it all seemed sensible. But economically, nothing really changed. The trust made money. The trust kept using the money. The same people controlled everything. The bucket company never actually used the funds for its own business or investments. This detail becomes important later. Year three: circular money without anyone realising By year three, things had become routine. Distributions were made to the kids again. The bucket company received another entitlement. Loans were adjusted at year-end through journal entries. What is really happening is a circular flow. Money was being allocated to beneficiaries, then effectively coming back to the trust, either because it was never paid out or because it was loaned back almost immediately. No one was trying to hide anything. No one thought they were doing the wrong thing. They were just following what they’d always done. This is how section 100A issues usually arise. Slowly, quietly, and without any single dramatic mistake.

Practice Update December 2025

3 December 2025
Rental deductions maximisation strategies

Practice Update November 2025

28 October 2025
A Practical Guide to Running Your Family Business in Australia