P r a c t i c e U p d a t e November 2023 - 2

Ian Campbell • 13 November 2023

Tax issues for businesses that have received a support payment


Taxpayers who have received a government support grant or payment recently to help their business recover from COVID-19 or a natural disaster should check if they need to include the payment in their assessable income.

Grants are generally treated as assessable income, and taxpayers may be able to claim deductions if they use these payments to:

  • purchase replacement trading stock or new assets;
  • repair their business premises and fit out; or
  • pay for other business expenses.


However, some grants are declared non-assessable, non-exempt ('NANE') income. This means taxpayers don't need to include them in their tax return if they meet certain eligibility requirements.

NANE grants include but are not limited to:

  • COVID-19 business support payments;
  • natural disaster grants; and
  • water infrastructure payments.


Taxpayers can only claim deductions for expenses associated with NANE grants if they relate directly to earning their assessable income, including wages, dividends, interest and rent. 

Taxpayers cannot claim expenses related to obtaining the grant, such as accountant's fees.

 

Care required in paying super benefits

Generally, before SMSF trustees pay a member's super benefits, they need to ensure that:

  • the member has reached their preservation age;
  • the member has met one of the conditions of release; and
  • the governing rules of the fund (e.g., the trust deed) allow it. 


Benefit payments to members who have not met a condition of release are not treated as super benefits. Instead, they will be taxed as ordinary income at the member's marginal tax rate.

If a benefit is unlawfully released, the ATO may apply significant penalties to:

  • the SMSF trustee;
  • the SMSF; and
  • the recipient of the early release. 


The ATO may also disqualify the trustee(s) involved.

Investment restrictions and other rules that apply to SMSFs in the accumulation phase continue to apply when members begin receiving a pension from the SMSF.

Where a member has met a condition of release, the trustee can either pay the benefit as a lump sum or super income stream (i.e., a pension). If a member has died, the trustee will generally pay a death benefit to a dependant or other beneficiary of the deceased, subject to the applicable rules.

 

Notice of visa data-matching program

The ATO will acquire visa data from the Department of Home Affairs for the 2024 to 2026 income years, including the following:

n     address history and contact history for visa applicants, sponsors, and migration agents;

n     active visas meeting the relevant criteria, and all visa grants;

n     visa grant status by point in time;

n     migration agents who assisted the processing of the visa;

n     all international travel movements undertaken by visa holders; and

n     sponsor details, and visa subclass name.

The ATO estimates that records relating to approximately nine million individuals will be obtained each financial year.

The objectives of this program are to (among other things) help ensure that individuals and businesses are fulfilling their tax and super reporting obligations, and identify potentially new or emergent approaches to fraud and those entities controlling or exploiting the visa framework.

 

ATO says: "Be cyber wise, don't compromise"

Throughout the 2022 income year, one cybercrime was reported every seven minutes. The ATO encourages taxpayers to implement the following four quick steps to protect themselves.

Step 1: Install updates for your devices and software

Regular updates ensure taxpayers have the latest security in place which can help prevent cyber criminals from hacking their devices. They should also make sure they are downloading authorised and legitimate programs.

Step 2: Implement multi-factor authentication

Multi-factor authentication ('MFA') is a security measure that requires at least two proofs of identity to grant access. Businesses as well as individuals should implement MFA wherever possible. MFA options can include a physical token, authenticator app, email or SMS.

Step 3: Regularly back up your files

Backing up copies of files to an external device or the 'cloud' means taxpayers can restore their files if something goes wrong. 

It is a precautionary measure that can help avoid costly data recovery.

Step 4: Change your passwords to passphrases

By using passphrases, taxpayers can boost the security of their accounts and make it harder for cyber criminals to access their information. 

Passphrases use four or more random words and can include symbols, capitals and numbers. A password manager can help generate or store passphrases.

 

Losses in crypto investments for SMSFs

Over the last few income years, the ATO has seen some instances of SMSF trustees losing their crypto asset investments.


These losses have been caused by:

  • crypto scams, where trustees were conned into investing their superannuation benefits in a fake crypto exchange;
  • theft, where fraudsters would hack into trustees' crypto accounts and steal all their crypto;
  • collapsed crypto trading platforms, many of which were based overseas; and
  • lost passwords, resulting in trustees being locked out of their crypto account and being unable to access their crypto.


Trustees thinking of investing in crypto need to be aware of the ways that crypto can be lost, including through scams, and how these scams can be avoided.

Many crypto assets are not commonly considered to be financial products, which means the platform where crypto is bought and sold may not be regulated by ASIC. 

Therefore, trustees may not be protected if the platform fails or is hacked. When a crypto platform fails they will most likely lose all of their crypto.

Investing in crypto can be complex and risky, and so the ATO recommends that trustees seek financial advice before investing.


20 January 2026
A real-world case study on trust distributions Mark and Lisa had what most people would describe as a “pretty standard” setup. They ran a successful family business through a discretionary trust. The trust had been in place for years, established when the business was small and cash was tight. Over time, the business grew, profits improved, and the trust started distributing decent amounts of income each year. The tax returns were lodged. Nobody had ever had a problem with the ATO. So naturally, they assumed everything was fine. This is where the story starts to get interesting. Year one: the harmless decision In a good year, the business made about $280,000. It was suggested that some income be distributed to Mark and Lisa’s two adult children, Josh and Emily. Both were over 18, both were studying, and neither earned much income. On paper, it made sense. Josh received $40,000. Emily received $40,000. The rest was split between Mark, Lisa, and a company beneficiary. The tax bill went down. Everyone was happy. But here’s the first quiet detail that mattered later. Josh and Emily never actually received the money. No bank transfer. No separate accounts. No conversations about what they wanted to do with it. The trust kept the funds in its main business account and used them to pay suppliers and reduce debt. At the time, nobody thought twice. “It’s still family money.” “They can access it if they need it.” “We’ll square it up later.” These are very common thoughts. And this is exactly where risk quietly begins. Year two: things get a little more complicated The next year was even better. They used a bucket company to cap tax at the company rate. Again, a common and legitimate strategy when used properly. So the trust distributed $200,000 to the company. No cash moved. It was recorded as an unpaid present entitlement. The idea was that the company would get paid later, when cash flow allowed. Meanwhile, the trust needed funds to buy new equipment and cover a short-term cash squeeze. The trust borrowed money from the company. There was a loan agreement. Interest was charged. Everything looked tidy on paper. From the outside, it all seemed sensible. But economically, nothing really changed. The trust made money. The trust kept using the money. The same people controlled everything. The bucket company never actually used the funds for its own business or investments. This detail becomes important later. Year three: circular money without anyone realising By year three, things had become routine. Distributions were made to the kids again. The bucket company received another entitlement. Loans were adjusted at year-end through journal entries. What is really happening is a circular flow. Money was being allocated to beneficiaries, then effectively coming back to the trust, either because it was never paid out or because it was loaned back almost immediately. No one was trying to hide anything. No one thought they were doing the wrong thing. They were just following what they’d always done. This is how section 100A issues usually arise. Slowly, quietly, and without any single dramatic mistake.
3 December 2025
Rental deductions maximisation strategies
28 October 2025
A Practical Guide to Running Your Family Business in Australia