Practice Update July 2021

Ian Campbell • 1 July 2021

P r a c t i c e  U p d a t e July 2021

Super guarantee contribution due date for June 2021 quarter


The due date for employers to make super guarantee contributions for their employees for the June 2021 quarter is 28 July 2021. 

Note that the super guarantee rate in relation to salary and wages paid on or before 30 June 2021 is 9.5%, but the super guarantee rate is 10% in relation to salary and wages paid  from 1 July 2021 (even if they are paid in relation to work performed before that date). 

Also, contributions made (and received by the fund) after 30 June 2021 will not be deductible in the 2021 income year, even if they are made in relation to work performed during the 2021 income year.

 

Extension of time to make repayments on Division 7A loans

Editor: Under a complying Division 7A loan from a private company, the borrower must make minimum yearly repayments ('MYR') before the end of the lender’s income year to avoid the loan being treated as an assessable dividend.

To offer more support due to the ongoing effects of COVID-19, an extension of the repayment period is now available for those who were unable to make their MYRs by the end of the lender’s 2020/21 income year (generally 30 June).

The borrower can apply for this administrative relief using the ATO's streamlined online application.  Note that they must still make up the shortfall of their 2020/21 MYR by 30 June 2022.

Editor: A similar extension was also available for the MYR for the 2019/20 year, and borrowers who obtained this extension needed to have made up that shortfall by 30 June 2021.

If they didn't meet this deadline, they will need to either obtain a further extension of time for the 2019/20 MYR outside the streamlined process, or amend their 2019/20 tax return to include a dividend.

 

Rent or lease payment changes due to COVID-19

The ATO has provided updates regarding the tax implications when a landlord gives, or a tenant receives, rent concessions (such as waivers or deferrals of rent) as a result of COVID-19. 

For example, the ATO provides the following advice for tenants that have received a rent waiver.

If the waived rent is related to a past period of occupancy that the tenant has already incurred and claimed a deduction for, they are still entitled to that deduction.


However:

q    if they have already paid the incurred rent and it has been waived and refunded to the tenant, they will need to include this amount in their assessable income when they receive it; or

q    if they have not already paid the incurred rent and it has been waived, the rent waiver will be a debt forgiveness.  When such a debt is forgiven, the tenant will make a gain.  The amount isn't usually included in the business's assessable income — it is instead offset against amounts that could otherwise reduce the business's taxable income. 

If the waived rent is related to a future period of occupancy, they will not be entitled to a deduction for that amount.

Editor: These types of rent concessions can give rise to various tax implications for both tenants and landlords (including GST implications), so please contact our office if you would like assistance in this regard.

 

Lost, damaged or destroyed tax records

The ATO knows that many taxpayers are facing lasting impacts left in the wake of natural disasters, so if they find their records have been lost or destroyed, whether in cyclones, floods or bushfires, the ATO can help.  According to ATO Assistant Commissioner Tim Loh:

“If you have a myGov account linked to the ATO, you’ll be able to view some of your records, including income tax returns, income statements and previous notices of assessments.  If you lodge through a registered tax agent, they can also access these documents on your behalf.”

Government agencies, private health funds, financial institutions and businesses provide information to the ATO which is available to tax agents and automatically included in returns by the end of July.

If taxpayers have lost receipts due to a natural disaster, the ATO can accept reasonable claims without evidence, so long as it’s not reasonably possible to access the original documents (although the taxpayer may be required to tell the ATO how they calculated the claim).

 

Introducing SMSF rollover alerts

Since February 2020, the ATO has been issuing alerts via email and SMS when certain changes are made to a self-managed super fund ('SMSF').

With the inclusion of SMSF rollovers in SuperStream, the ATO will send the fund an email and/or text message alert when the fund uses the SMSF verification service ('SVS') to verify the SMSF's details before making a rollover. 

Note that funds may use this service multiple times when actioning a single rollover request, which may result in receiving multiple alerts.

These alerts are being sent to help safeguard retirement savings and reduce the risk of fraud or misconduct.

If a fund receives an alert and is already aware of the rollover request, there is nothing more that needs to be done.

However, if a member didn't request a rollover to be made to an SMSF, or they want more information, they will need to contact their existing super fund(s) as a matter of priority, as rollovers through SuperStream may be processed in as little as 3 business days.

 

SMSF limited recourse borrowing arrangements interest rates

The ATO has confirmed that the following interest rates charged under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement ('LRBA') to an SMSF would be consistent with the safe harbour terms the ATO will accept for the 2021/22 financial year.

Real property:                        5.10%

Listed shares or units:           7.10%

Note that these rates are unchanged from those the ATO accepted for the 2020/21 year.

 

New ATO data-matching programs

The ATO has advised that it will engage in two new data matching programs, as outlined below:

q    the ATO will acquire novated lease data from McMillan Shakespeare Group, Smartgroup Corporation, SG Fleet Group, Eclipx Group, LeasePlan, Toyota Fleet Management, LeasePLUS and Orix Australia for the 2018/19 through to 2022/23 financial years (relating to approximately 260,000 individuals each financial year); and

q    the ATO will acquire account identification and transaction data from cryptocurrency designated service providers for the 2021 financial year through to the 2023 financial year inclusively (relating to approximately 400,000 to 600,000 individuals each financial year).

 

Please Note: Many of the comments in this publication are general in nature and anyone intending to apply the information to practical circumstances should seek professional advice to independently verify their interpretation and the information’s applicability to their particular circumstances.

20 January 2026
A real-world case study on trust distributions Mark and Lisa had what most people would describe as a “pretty standard” setup. They ran a successful family business through a discretionary trust. The trust had been in place for years, established when the business was small and cash was tight. Over time, the business grew, profits improved, and the trust started distributing decent amounts of income each year. The tax returns were lodged. Nobody had ever had a problem with the ATO. So naturally, they assumed everything was fine. This is where the story starts to get interesting. Year one: the harmless decision In a good year, the business made about $280,000. It was suggested that some income be distributed to Mark and Lisa’s two adult children, Josh and Emily. Both were over 18, both were studying, and neither earned much income. On paper, it made sense. Josh received $40,000. Emily received $40,000. The rest was split between Mark, Lisa, and a company beneficiary. The tax bill went down. Everyone was happy. But here’s the first quiet detail that mattered later. Josh and Emily never actually received the money. No bank transfer. No separate accounts. No conversations about what they wanted to do with it. The trust kept the funds in its main business account and used them to pay suppliers and reduce debt. At the time, nobody thought twice. “It’s still family money.” “They can access it if they need it.” “We’ll square it up later.” These are very common thoughts. And this is exactly where risk quietly begins. Year two: things get a little more complicated The next year was even better. They used a bucket company to cap tax at the company rate. Again, a common and legitimate strategy when used properly. So the trust distributed $200,000 to the company. No cash moved. It was recorded as an unpaid present entitlement. The idea was that the company would get paid later, when cash flow allowed. Meanwhile, the trust needed funds to buy new equipment and cover a short-term cash squeeze. The trust borrowed money from the company. There was a loan agreement. Interest was charged. Everything looked tidy on paper. From the outside, it all seemed sensible. But economically, nothing really changed. The trust made money. The trust kept using the money. The same people controlled everything. The bucket company never actually used the funds for its own business or investments. This detail becomes important later. Year three: circular money without anyone realising By year three, things had become routine. Distributions were made to the kids again. The bucket company received another entitlement. Loans were adjusted at year-end through journal entries. What is really happening is a circular flow. Money was being allocated to beneficiaries, then effectively coming back to the trust, either because it was never paid out or because it was loaned back almost immediately. No one was trying to hide anything. No one thought they were doing the wrong thing. They were just following what they’d always done. This is how section 100A issues usually arise. Slowly, quietly, and without any single dramatic mistake.
3 December 2025
Rental deductions maximisation strategies
28 October 2025
A Practical Guide to Running Your Family Business in Australia